“Books
will soon be obsolete in the public schools…our school system will be
completely changed inside of ten years.”
Amazingly enough, however, one of our nation’s most
important inventors was proven quite wrong. The American education system has a
remarkable resistance to innovation and the classroom experience has changed
very little in the 100 years since Edison’s prediction.
Advances in information technology have
revolutionized how people communicate and learn in nearly every aspect of
modern life except for education. The education system operates under the
antiquated needs of an agrarian and industrial America. The short school day
and the break in the summer were meant to allow children to work on family
farms. Schools have an enduring industrial mentality placing students in
arbitrary groups based on their age regardless of their competencies.
Technology has failed to transform our schools
because the education governance system insulates them from the disruptions
that technology creates in other organizations. The government regulates
schools perhaps more than any other organization. Rules govern where students
study, how they will learn, and who will teach them. Education regulation
governs the relationships of actors in the system and stymies the impact of
innovative technologies. Furthermore the diffuse system of governance creates
numerous veto points to limit innovation.
To overcome these obstacles, we must persuade
teachers that technology will empower them and help their students learn. We
argue that there are five strategies for successful teacher adoption of
education technology and that these principles will help fulfil the potential
that Edison saw a century ago:
Schools
must use technology that empowers teachers. Teachers rightly reject education
technologies that divert their attention from instruction. The best education
technologies enable teachers to do more with fewer resources. Communication
platforms like Twitter, Facebook, or Tumblr enable dynamic communication with
students. Teacher-empowering technologies include mobile apps that grade
written student work and provide lesson plan databases. School systems need to
aggressively track what works for their teachers and put all other unworkable
technologies aside.
Teachers
should treat the adoption of technology as part of lesson planning. One of the major drivers of bad
policy is policy churn. New district leaders want to make their mark adopting
new policies and jettisoning the old. This constant changing of priorities
makes beneficial reforms difficult to implement. Teachers can incorporate
technology directly into their practice and insulate their students from the
deleterious effects of policy churn. For example teachers can use Khan Academy
or other online resources to improve remediation. Systematic adoption of
technology at the classroom levels limits the damage of shifting policy maker
priorities.
Teachers
should not fear open-source technologies. Many mistakenly believe that education
technologies are expensive and complicated to use. Open-source technologies are
stable, secure, and compatible with other platforms. Organizations both small
and large use open source devices every day. Many businesses use open-source
servers for their efficiency and costs savings. They often have large
communities that provide high quality customer support. Best of all,
open-source technologies often cost less than proprietary products.
Use
online education portfolios to evaluate students. Educators have known about the
benefits of paper based portfolios for generations. Portfolios allow students
to express creativity for difficult to assess subjects. Teachers can choose
from a variety of online portfolio providers tailored to the needs of their
classroom. They also serve as a platform for students to demonstrate growth.
Online portfolios have many advantages over paper based options because they
cost less and allow for more robust outreach. Online portfolios are also
amenable to a wider variety of formats including video, music or other interactive
features.
Teachers
should embrace the Common Core State Standards. Common standards make teaching
simpler. Teachers have to write lessons that comply with district, state, and
national standards (e.g. NCTM or NCTE). Having a single set of standards eliminates
redundancy and conflicting guidelines. Furthermore universal adoption of common
standards will support future technological innovations that aid teachers. From
a technical perspective, standards facilitate the development of new
technologies. Innovators can focus on developing tools that better serve
students rather than solving technical challenges of interoperability created
by multiple sets of standards.
Undoubtedly weak financial support inhibits the
adoption of education technology. Despite this obstacle, teachers working
together have tremendous potential to reform education. Every day teachers face
choices about how to implement the curriculum and instruct students. Those
moments are opportunities for teachers to engage in education reform that has a
real impact on students. Teachers should use education technologies that are
inexpensive, easy to use, and improve student learning.